Easy Come, Easy Go

I get a lot of mailings (of both the snail and electronic varieties) from for-profit educational companies companies that sell educational education-related materials and workshops; I imagine they get my address from one or more of the many professional organizations of which I am a member.  While I normally relegate these brochures and catalogs to the circular file within minutes of receipt, I’ll usually give them at least a cursory glance before doing so.  It disheartens me that one of the key selling points for various protocols, products, and workshops I keep seeing over and over again is *EASY!*

Don’t get me wrong; I like convenience as much as the next guy, but I’m drawn to wonder – if *EASY!* is the best selling point you can come up with for your product…

  • how valuable could it possibly be?
  • what can it do that I, with some degree of effort, couldn’t figure out a way to do that is more meaningful or relevant to my students?
  • why does your company have such a low opinion of educators (“it’s so easy, even a teacher can use it!”)?

I’m of the opinion that things worth doing or learning are worth an investment of time and effort – I know, one thing to say and yet another to do in the mandate-driven world of public education – but this just seems indicative of the instant-gratification culture that we often bemoan, most often in reference to our students.  Everyone reading this blog has had this conversation with their students and/or their own children.

One good thing that has come of my disgust with *EASY!* is that I’ve become very aware of it in my own language, especially when running workshops for my fellow educators.  “Convenient” has its place, and I tend to favor “intuitive” when describing tools like wikis or Google Docs, because while there is definitely an initial learning curve to each of those tools, they are fairly user-friendly and draw upon an assumed level of prior knowledge to facilitate their use.  But as I said, if it’s worth learning about for the benefit of our students’ or our own learning, is it not worth putting in some time and effort, or at least some stick-to-it-iveness (look that up in your Funk & Wagnall’s) while you determine the potential pros and cons?

I’m not saying we have to re-invent the wheel every time we make a move in education.  If something is beneficial to kids and happens to be easy as well, then great.  But doing something simply because it’s *EASY!* is not a good enough criterion when it comes to education.  We never accept it from our students; let’s not accept it from ourselves, either.


  • […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Damian Bariexca. Damian Bariexca said: New blog post: Easy Come, Easy Go | Apace of Change http://t.co/KGdNCQQ […]

  • I agree with you on this. Yet, even if it is “easy” some teachers don’t want to change their ways. I don’t think it’s a convenience problem with some people, it’s just not wanting to change they way they educate students and find new innovative ways.

  • @Anthony Yeah, and I guess I can kind of see how some vets might not think the younger generation have anything to teach them (although with 11 years in, I feel like I straddle the line between the two camps). It’s a very binary way of thinking, though, this ‘experienced’ vs. ‘innovative’ – and it’s detrimental to nobody but the students. All I try to do is introduce folks to tools and suggest possible uses – not saying they have to change the way they teach, but just trying to give them a few more tools for their respective toolboxes.

Join the Discussion

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.